Booo! I don't know what all they hype surrounding this book is about. The only thing I got from this book is that Elizabeth Gilbert is a self-indulgent emotional woman who can't stick to the commitments she makes. She literally got paid to throw herself a traveling pity party and write a book about it. I might have been able to tolerate this if there was any kind of legitimate trauma in her life to warrant her behavior, but no reason is ever really given. She left her husband because of what? Boredom? She becomes a cougar and hooks up with a young stud, but still is unsatisfied. Then she takes a vow of celibacy only to break it. Sorry chick, but I have no sympathy for you. Your boring bad decisions don't warrant my attention.
I had hoped that they would at least try and spice the movie up a little, but I am convinced the only reason that movie sold a single ticket was because Julia Roberts was in it. I turned it off after 10 minutes.
If you couldn't tell, I do not recommend this book.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold
Brief commentary for those who have not read this yet:
This book was a national bestseller, which, to me, doesn't necessarily indicate that it's a good read. However, in this particular case I can see why it became popular. This was Alice Sebold's first novel and she has a unique writing style, which I admire. The book has an imaginative plot about a young girl who is murdered and then watches life continue on without her from heaven. There were times when things were moving too slowly for me, and on several occasions I was more confused than enlightened by some of her descriptions, but this may say more about my ineptitude in finding the intended relevance in analogies as opposed to Sebold's proficiency in clarification. By the way, I blame my aversion to metaphors/analogies/similes on my father and husband who both like to use these devices in attempts to stupefy instead of clarify forcing me to over-analyze them to determine their significance, thus instilling my unnatural dislike and confusion surrounding these comparisons, which is really quite a shame since analogies can be a beautiful writing tool. Anyway, back to the book. There were also a lot of flashbacks that may help you get to know the characters better, but often times I found myself wishing she would just get back to the main story. Bottom line, it wasn't a totally engrossing page-turner, but it is worth reading if you have the time and you can't think of something more appealing to read.
This book was a national bestseller, which, to me, doesn't necessarily indicate that it's a good read. However, in this particular case I can see why it became popular. This was Alice Sebold's first novel and she has a unique writing style, which I admire. The book has an imaginative plot about a young girl who is murdered and then watches life continue on without her from heaven. There were times when things were moving too slowly for me, and on several occasions I was more confused than enlightened by some of her descriptions, but this may say more about my ineptitude in finding the intended relevance in analogies as opposed to Sebold's proficiency in clarification. By the way, I blame my aversion to metaphors/analogies/similes on my father and husband who both like to use these devices in attempts to stupefy instead of clarify forcing me to over-analyze them to determine their significance, thus instilling my unnatural dislike and confusion surrounding these comparisons, which is really quite a shame since analogies can be a beautiful writing tool. Anyway, back to the book. There were also a lot of flashbacks that may help you get to know the characters better, but often times I found myself wishing she would just get back to the main story. Bottom line, it wasn't a totally engrossing page-turner, but it is worth reading if you have the time and you can't think of something more appealing to read.
Detailed Commentary (Contains Spoilers):
I was completely taken aback when the main character, Susie Salmon, begins describing her murder in chapter one. It left me thinking where can this possibly go from here? The murder being as horrific and gruesome as it was does open your eyes to the dangers that could be just around the corner in even the most seemingly quintessential neighborhoods. Even though Susie Salmon ends up in her warm happy place, I was certainly nowhere near mine after reading the first few chapters of this book.
As Susie watches her family's lives fall apart for the majority of the remainder of the book I kind of started wishing we could have spent more time in Susie's heaven instead of watching the dominoes of the lives left behind continually fall. Speaking of the heaven in this book, was it just me or was anyone else a little confused about where, what, or how it was? I get the concept of "going to your happy place", and that heaven is an unknown that words can't describe, but I had trouble understanding how she could be in this idealistic heaven and in the midst of her family back home at the same time. She sat in her gazebo and watched everyone somehow. I felt out of the loop on that, but maybe I just missed something.
Her mother, Abigail, absolutely bugs! I get it, she was forced to abandon the life that she really wanted by intentionally getting married, settling down, and having kids. How could she be so unlucky? Then of course, her daughter's murder rattles her cage of sacrificial containment so much that she manages to break loose and turns into a selfish, heartless, whore-bag. The stuff dreams are made of. I'll admit she kept the story interesting at times, but like a lot of the things in this book, she left a bitter taste in my mouth.
Ray and Ruth were a boring side story until the whole Susie possessing Ruth thing happened and then things just got uncomfortable. Never mind the whole possession awkwardness, if I was raped and murdered would sex really be the one thing I would want to do if I have a few hours in a body back on earth? I don't know, I guess getting some last words in to your devastated family and catching your murderer before he kills again could take a backseat to a really phenomenal orgasm. Selfish, like mother like daughter.
As for the corporeal villain in the story, Harvey, I am left feeling disappointed. Sebold tried to give us a glimpse of his childhood as if to explain or support who he became, but I gleaned nothing from these flashbacks that would create a monster of this caliber. I felt like I was left hanging with regards to his character development. I think none would have been better than the little that we were given. Now to his demise. Though Harvey's death was most likely intended to be symbolic of a universe that naturally creates balance, i.e. an isolated, cold, and quiet killer dying an isolated, cold, and quiet death, I couldn't help but want that sicko to get caught, hung, and burned. What's the real message here? Life is never fair, but death always is? Screw that! I get enough reality in reality, I want to see some good ol' retribution in my fiction.
Finally, let me address the title "The Lovely Bones". On page 320 our title is introduced, and thus my analogy befuddlement kicks in. So, Sebold is comparing the events that took place after Susie's death to bones that will culminate and form a body at some point. Susie's family and friends are broken down by her murder and then manage to rebuild their lives in a way that would supposedly have been impossible had Susie not died. So, in this twisted analogy Susie's body is lost forever, but a new one is built with the "lovely bones" of lives rebuilt. I guess I get it, but this is one of those times were I was more confused than edified. I may be a pessimist, but even I don't think that a little girl needs to be raped and murdered in order for a few people to get their crap together. Maybe it is just me, but I don't find it lovely at all.
In the end I guess I have to give Alice Sebold kudos for getting me riled up as much as she did. She is a very talented writer. She just isn't the type of writer that I identify with. And I swear, not all of her sentiments in this book were lost on me, I just don't agree with them.
As Susie watches her family's lives fall apart for the majority of the remainder of the book I kind of started wishing we could have spent more time in Susie's heaven instead of watching the dominoes of the lives left behind continually fall. Speaking of the heaven in this book, was it just me or was anyone else a little confused about where, what, or how it was? I get the concept of "going to your happy place", and that heaven is an unknown that words can't describe, but I had trouble understanding how she could be in this idealistic heaven and in the midst of her family back home at the same time. She sat in her gazebo and watched everyone somehow. I felt out of the loop on that, but maybe I just missed something.
Her mother, Abigail, absolutely bugs! I get it, she was forced to abandon the life that she really wanted by intentionally getting married, settling down, and having kids. How could she be so unlucky? Then of course, her daughter's murder rattles her cage of sacrificial containment so much that she manages to break loose and turns into a selfish, heartless, whore-bag. The stuff dreams are made of. I'll admit she kept the story interesting at times, but like a lot of the things in this book, she left a bitter taste in my mouth.
Ray and Ruth were a boring side story until the whole Susie possessing Ruth thing happened and then things just got uncomfortable. Never mind the whole possession awkwardness, if I was raped and murdered would sex really be the one thing I would want to do if I have a few hours in a body back on earth? I don't know, I guess getting some last words in to your devastated family and catching your murderer before he kills again could take a backseat to a really phenomenal orgasm. Selfish, like mother like daughter.
As for the corporeal villain in the story, Harvey, I am left feeling disappointed. Sebold tried to give us a glimpse of his childhood as if to explain or support who he became, but I gleaned nothing from these flashbacks that would create a monster of this caliber. I felt like I was left hanging with regards to his character development. I think none would have been better than the little that we were given. Now to his demise. Though Harvey's death was most likely intended to be symbolic of a universe that naturally creates balance, i.e. an isolated, cold, and quiet killer dying an isolated, cold, and quiet death, I couldn't help but want that sicko to get caught, hung, and burned. What's the real message here? Life is never fair, but death always is? Screw that! I get enough reality in reality, I want to see some good ol' retribution in my fiction.
Finally, let me address the title "The Lovely Bones". On page 320 our title is introduced, and thus my analogy befuddlement kicks in. So, Sebold is comparing the events that took place after Susie's death to bones that will culminate and form a body at some point. Susie's family and friends are broken down by her murder and then manage to rebuild their lives in a way that would supposedly have been impossible had Susie not died. So, in this twisted analogy Susie's body is lost forever, but a new one is built with the "lovely bones" of lives rebuilt. I guess I get it, but this is one of those times were I was more confused than edified. I may be a pessimist, but even I don't think that a little girl needs to be raped and murdered in order for a few people to get their crap together. Maybe it is just me, but I don't find it lovely at all.
In the end I guess I have to give Alice Sebold kudos for getting me riled up as much as she did. She is a very talented writer. She just isn't the type of writer that I identify with. And I swear, not all of her sentiments in this book were lost on me, I just don't agree with them.
For Starters...
I am not sure how well I will keep up with this blog. I guess it will depend on whether or not people read it and how much I enjoy keeping it up. I intend for this to be a place where people can comment on books that I have read, or books that they think I should read. Basically I would like to see this become an online Book Club of sorts. I will keep an ongoing list of books on the right side of the blog that anyone is welcome to comment on at anytime. My goal is to pick one of the books each week for specific discussion. I will try to write a brief recommendation and also a more descriptive opinion on the book chosen each week. Just as a disclaimer, most of the books I read are by recommendation and I am by no means an expert book critic, but I am a pessimistic curmudgeon, so I am reasonably difficult to please. That said, don't be surprised if most of my critiques seem somewhat harsh or negative. Also, I am not the type of person who likes artsy-fartsy books that are so descriptive that you lose the overall plot as you drudge your way through infinite analogies. Simply put, I enjoy books that entertain me and give me a reprieve from my daily monotony. So, that's enough crap, let's get started.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
